Discussion about this post

User's avatar
G G's avatar

ABSOLUTELY! We have been far too patient with the forces of white Supremacy from the beginning in this country. From the founding documents where we had to remove the positions against slavery to keep the slave states on board to the creation of the electoral college, allowing monuments to and bases named for confederates who fought against the U.S.A. to the southern myth that the Civil War was the war of northern aggression. We need to stop tip-toeing around this. America cannot achieve full greatness while refusing to acknowledge being birthed from our origional sin of racism. It's not ok.

Expand full comment
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

Not-so-strange coincidence: I've been working on a piece titled "So Let's Talk About Fascism (Everybody Else Is, Right?)." In it I refer to Jim Crow as "fascism's first cousin." Academic refugees from Nazi Germany who wound up teaching in the South, often at HBCUs, saw and were startled by the connection. A member of my writers' group suggested that by definition fascism needs a single strongman at the top, so the Jim Crow South didn't qualify as fascist. The MAGA movement and the current GOP do qualify, with Trump as the strongman. I agree that Trump is a fascist, to the extent that he has any ideology at all, but I have a hard time seeing him as a strongman in the mold of Mussolini, Hitler, and Franco. He's more a means to an end for the men behind him, the Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society, the Project 2025 crowd, and the rest of them: they don't have the charisma to rally great crowds or the votes to get into office legally, so they need a Trump. Whether they could control him if he got elected, I don't know and I don't think we're going to find out. But the odds look better than they were for the German conservatives in the early 1930s, if only because Hitler was 44 in 1933 while Trump is now 78.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts