Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

It helps to think of the Trump II administration as the endgame, a culmination, not a beginning. White male supremacy has been there since the founding -- since well before the founding, in fact. U.S. history can be seen as an ongoing fight to expand beyond (rise above?) the country's origins. Every victory -- for instance, the post–Civil War amendments, and the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of the mid-1960s -- has spawned a ferocious backlash against it. (I almost included the 19th Amendment here, but the backlash against it wasn't quite as ferocious.)

MAGA is the spawn of that backlash. Trump named it, but how new is it? Not very. Under other names it too goes back to the founding: think of all the white people who fought for and otherwise supported the Confederacy, even though the Southern oligarchs didn't have their best interests at heart. They've been raising monuments and flags to it ever since. They controlled Congress so thoroughly that the New Deal capitulated to them almost every step of the way.

Finally -- the left-right spectrum was devised primarily by white men of European descent. It's never adequately accounted for the interests and priorities of non-men and non-white people. This helps explain why some white liberals and "moderates" (whatever that means) like to call, e.g., Elizabeth Warren and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez "far leftists" even though they have nothing in common with the "far leftists" of yesteryear, e.g., Josef Stalin. IOW, it's been broken for a very long time. Realignment is long overdue for sure, but "pro-democracy" has to be a key criterion. The GOP has been evolving into an anti-democratic party since the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of the '60s and Roe v. Wade in the early '70s. An acknowledgment of economic power would also be good, since the oligarchs are benefiting from, and funding, all this "originalism" crap. But that's going to be hard, because too many of "we the people" still think that only commie pinkos talk about economic power.

Expand full comment
John.W's avatar

Excellent insights, and article.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts